In the Spring of 2005, a first, internal committee was put in place to look into the idea and assess the potential advantages and inconveniences of an Advisory Committee. This initial committee was composed of five members of management. Optim Ressources, a firm specializing in Sustainable Development, was recruited in the Fall of 2005 to help in the implementation of the Committee, and to facilitate the meetings of the Committee.
Using the framework of a model brought by the consultants, the stakeholders were identified. This stakeholder identification model proposed 5 distinct profiles : financial, commercial, social (internal), community, and political. To validate the final selection of participants, these profiles were crossed with the themes that Alcoa Canada wanted to address. To recruit the different participants, Alcoa Canada and Optim Ressources proceeded to meet with pontential candidates individually, explain the “rules of the game“, gather additional subjects that the participants wanted to discuss and their suggestions as to the functionning of the Committee.
In 2006, the final committee is composed of the following :
8 external members, including two members from provincial unions, a member of the Youth Council (Conseil permanent de la Jeunesse), a member of the Union of Municipalities, one member of the Regroupement des conseils régionaux de l’environnement (Quebec association of regional environemental council), a member of the Minisitry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks, a local supplier to Alcoa Canada, and a banker.
5 representatives of Alcoa Canada (Finance, Public Affaires, Communications, Human Resources, Environment and Sustainable Development, Operations)
Over time, the group grew to include a research representative and a representative from a community group.
Each theme was treated in 3 work sessions :
1) the committee studies the proposals from Alcoa Canada on the theme proposed and, in workshops, they formulate their own expectations and make suggestions;
2) the managment committee from Alcoa analyses the suggestions;
3) Alcoa gives feedback to the Committee, detailing the reasons that lead to the integration or rejection of the suggestions made.
Seven principal facteurs explain the success of the project :
-Clarity of the “rules of the game“ right from the start;
-The quality and the commitment of the participants;
-The involvement of upper managment at Alcoa, giving credibility to the process;
-The flexibility in the choice of subjects treated and the functionning of the Committee;
-The transparency of information;
-The concretness of the work sessions; and
-The facilitation of the meetings by an objective, external resource.